Legalization of Bribery: An opinion
by Shashank Agrawal
Amongst various of its forms,
Bribery is a widespread form of corruption. Bribery is considered to be more
heinous form of corruption as the person who is not legally entitled to a right
over something gets it in consideration of some value exchange, usually.
Bribery involves at least two parties one who gives the bribe and other one is
at the receiving end. Though both the parties are legally culprit for spreading
this crime, but through this blog post I put a thought that the bribe giver in
certain cases should not be penalized and have mercy from the court of law. By
doing this, the interests of bribe giver and bribe taker will be at variance
and bribe giver will be keener to help the law and make the bribe taker get
caught. For the purpose of classification, bribes are detailed of two types one
is harassment bribe and other one is non-harassment bribes.
Harassment bribes are given by
people to get what are legally entitled to. e.g. bribe given to income tax
officer to get the refund released. In these cases, the interests of bribe
taker are more corrosive to society as even after having a legal entitlement
over something or to get his own thing, a person has to give some consideration
to bribe taker. This spreads the anarchy in the society and at large people are
made to believe that its acceptable to give bribe in order to get the things
done in time. In case of harassment bribe, usually the bribe giver gives the
bribe by killing his own conscious. He will be more interested in getting the
bribe taker caught. Hence in these cases if bribe giver has immunity from any
punitive actions, there are fair chances that bribe taker will be caught and
penalized. Currently, since giving and taking bribe is a crime, both parties
are subjected to punishment. Hence, the innocent bribe giver also doesn't come
forward and report against the bribe taker. Henceforth implementation of this
idea will definitely cut down the incidences of bribery. If under current law
both parties are equally punished, then under the proposed system the bribe
giver should be penalized at zero and bribe taker should be penalized at 2x.
While in case of non-harassment
bribes, the bribe giver is likely to get something by giving the bribe what he
doesn't deserve to get. He gets the possession of something which is not
supposed to be in his possession. E.g. bribes given to acquire the government
contracts. Can in these cases also, the bribe giver be immunized? The answer is
No. Since by offering the bribe to get something which one is not entitled to
induces to be a criminal offense and its consequences are much corrosive on
society, the bribe giver should be penalized with heftier fines.
In harassment bribes, the immunization to
bribe giver will not cause the bribery to vanish altogether but the incidences
will come down to a considerable extent. The bribe taker will fear of complaint
which may be lodged by immunized bribe giver and hence he will not be keen to
take bribe.
In my opinion, along with legal penalties
& immunization, government may adopt some other measures to curb down the
malpractices of bribery such as by introducing and strengthening the
e-governance systems whereby the interface between the public at large and
public servants is made minimal. Further, if the derelictions of bribery are to
be vanished, we need to build the optimum cultural and social traits where
there is no scope of corruption and generations to come are taught about the malign
consequences of committing the atrocious crime as bribery is.
This is only an opinion not
limited to other individual beliefs at large.
Comments
Post a Comment